Chief Justice of India Calls for AI Disclosure Standards in International Arbitration
Stories are grouped across languages, rewritten into a fixed editorial format, and linked to original sources.
TL;DR
- Chief Justice Surya Kant addresses the ethical and practical challenges of AI in international arbitration.
- Calls for mandatory disclosure when AI is used to prepare evidence or expert submissions.
- Urges development of shared standards to address deepfake and AI-generated evidence.
- Supports responsible use of AI for efficiency while preserving core arbitration principles.
Overview
At a recent arbitration conference, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant discussed the evolving role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in international arbitration, highlighting ethical challenges and advocating for transparent disclosure protocols when AI tools are used in evidence or submissions.
What Happened
Chief Justice Surya Kant delivered a keynote address at the SIAC Annual India Conference-2026 on the integration of AI into international arbitration.
He pointed out that AI has rapidly become central to arbitration processes, raising concerns about the accuracy and authenticity of AI-generated material in arbitral proceedings.
The Chief Justice called for mandatory disclosure whenever generative AI is used for witness statements or expert reports, noting that this would promote transparency without hindering innovation.
Kant also suggested the need for common protocols and shared standards across tribunals to consistently address digital evidence, such as deepfakes or AI-generated statements.
He endorsed the use of AI for specific tasks like document management and translation to improve efficiency, provided that fundamental arbitration principles like confidentiality and timely dispute resolution are preserved.
Context
Rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence in legal practice is prompting new ethical and procedural questions, especially in the field of international arbitration.
Institutions such as the Singapore International Arbitration Centre are already exploring shared guidelines to verify digital evidence and address risks posed by generative AI.
Why It Matters
- Calls for disclosure protocols and shared standards could shape how arbitration institutions and practitioners globally address the risks and benefits of AI.
- Clear guidelines may help maintain trust in arbitration processes amid technological change, especially concerning the authenticity of evidence and the fairness of proceedings.