ICSID Arbitration Initiated by Neltume Ports Against Uruguay Over Montecon Investment
Stories are grouped across languages, rewritten into a fixed editorial format, and linked to original sources. How we report.
TL;DR
- Neltume Ports has formally commenced arbitration against Uruguay at ICSID.
- The dispute concerns US$600 million over Montecon's port operations.
- Neltume alleges a violation of the Uruguay-Chile investment treaty.
- The first procedural session is taking place this week.
Overview
Neltume Ports, a Chilean company holding a 60% stake in Montecon, has begun formal arbitration proceedings against Uruguay at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The dispute centers on Neltume's claim for US$600 million, alleging that Uruguay's extension of the Terminal Cuenca del Plata (TCP) port concession violated the investment promotion treaty between Uruguay and Chile.
What Happened
Neltume Ports initiated the claim two years ago, asserting that Uruguay's agreement with Katoen Natie to extend the TCP port concession harmed Montecon's interests and breached treaty protections.
The ICSID tribunal has been constituted since July of the previous year, and the first formal session is being held this week.
Following the request of the parties, there was a period of negotiation and a temporary suspension of the arbitration, after which Neltume Ports sought an extension that was refused by the Uruguayan government. The tribunal then scheduled initial proceedings.
Neltume Ports is seeking compensation of US$600 million according to prior public communications.
Context
Montecon operates in the public areas of Montevideo's port. Its ownership is divided between Neltume Ports (60%) and ATCO (40%).
A parallel ICSID arbitration was filed in May 2024 by ATCO, Montecon's other major shareholder, claiming US$240 million against Uruguay under the Uruguay-Canada investment treaty. That proceeding has not yet progressed.
Why It Matters
- The case involves a significant claim by a foreign investor under an investment treaty, attracting scrutiny to Uruguay's handling of concessions and investor protection.
- Multiple proceedings before ICSID may impact Uruguay's investment climate and regulatory framework for port operations.