Arbitration United States

DC Circuit Upholds Enforcement of $59 Million Arbitration Award Against Venezuela

Published 2026-06-13 1 source Arbitral Award Arbitration Award Enforcement United States Venezuela United States

Stories are grouped across languages, rewritten into a fixed editorial format, and linked to original sources. How we report.

TL;DR

  • DC Circuit affirmed enforcement of a $59 million arbitration award against Venezuela.
  • The dispute concerned corporate dividends owed to Venezuela US SRL, a Barbados-based company.
  • The court rejected Venezuela's argument relating to US recognition of the Maduro government.

Overview

On Friday, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the enforcement of a $59 million international arbitration award against Venezuela. The case centered on a corporate dividends dispute involving Venezuela and Venezuela US SRL, a company based in Barbados.

What Happened

A federal district court had previously enforced the $59 million arbitration award in favor of Venezuela US SRL.

Venezuela challenged this enforcement in the DC Circuit, arguing that upholding the award would disregard the US government's decision in 2020 to stop recognizing Nicolás Maduro as the country's legitimate president.

In a split decision, Judge A. Raymond Randolph wrote that enforcing the award would not infringe on the powers of the US president regarding foreign recognition.

The DC Circuit thus affirmed the lower court's enforcement decision, allowing Venezuela US SRL to pursue collection of the $59 million.

Context

The dispute concerns payment of corporate dividends to a Barbados-based entity. Venezuela argued that the changing political recognition of its government by the United States should impact the enforceability of the award, but the court disagreed. The case reflects issues at the intersection of international arbitration enforcement and US foreign policy recognition.

Why It Matters

  • The ruling allows Venezuela US SRL to continue efforts to collect the arbitration award in US courts.
  • The decision clarifies that the US court's enforcement of international arbitration awards is not impeded by executive branch policy on political recognition.

Sources

Related Stories