US Ninth Circuit Upholds Confirmation of Devas $562.5M Arbitration Award Against Antrix
Stories are grouped across languages, rewritten into a fixed editorial format, and linked to original sources.
TL;DR
- US Ninth Circuit upheld confirmation of Devas's $562.5 million ICC award against Antrix.
- Court found jurisdiction existed under the FSIA's arbitration exception.
- Forum non conveniens is inapplicable to New York Convention award enforcement.
- Judgment registration for Mauritian shareholders was reversed for lack of standing.
Overview
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has confirmed the enforcement of a $562.5 million arbitral award granted to Devas Multimedia against Antrix Corporation, the commercial arm of India's ISRO, following ICC arbitration. The ruling addressed issues under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and clarified aspects of the New York Convention enforcement process.
What Happened
The dispute arose from a 2005 agreement where Antrix agreed to provide satellite services and S-band spectrum to Devas, which Antrix later terminated in 2011. Devas commenced ICC arbitration, which resulted in a $562.5 million award in 2015 for wrongful repudiation.
Devas sought confirmation of the award in a US federal district court in 2018. The district court confirmed the award, but Antrix appealed to the Ninth Circuit.
The Ninth Circuit initially found in favor of Antrix on jurisdictional grounds, but the US Supreme Court reversed, clarifying that FSIA does not require additional 'minimum contacts.'
On remand, the Ninth Circuit held that the FSIA's arbitration exception gave US courts subject-matter jurisdiction and rejected arguments that a US commercial nexus was required. The court also ruled that forum non conveniens does not apply to New York Convention confirmation proceedings, and affirmed judgment registration for Devas Multimedia America but reversed registration for three Mauritian shareholders.
Context
The underlying arbitration dealt with India's decision not to provide Devas with access to S-band spectrum for commercial use, leading to the repudiation of an agreement between Devas and Antrix. The matter has involved parallel proceedings and award challenges in multiple jurisdictions, and the US award is now estimated by Devas's counsel to be worth over $2 billion with interest.
Why It Matters
- The ruling clarifies the scope of US court jurisdiction in enforcing foreign arbitral awards against state-owned entities under the FSIA.
- It confirms that forum non conveniens cannot be used to refuse enforcement proceedings under the New York Convention in the US.
- The decision affects the ability to attach US-based assets belonging to foreign state-owned companies and sets procedural clarity for similar award enforcement cases.