Shanghai Electric Wins Key Rulings at Singapore International Arbitration Centre in Sasan Power Project Dispute
Stories are grouped across languages, rewritten into a fixed editorial format, and linked to original sources. How we report.
TL;DR
- Shanghai Electric prevailed in key SIAC rulings over the Sasan Power Project in India.
- The tribunal dismissed Oxagon's claims for alleged losses with prejudice.
- Oxagon was ordered to pay Shanghai Electric around US$1.28 million in costs.
- The Singapore International Commercial Court previously upheld a US$146.3 million award to Shanghai Electric.
Overview
Shanghai Electric Group has secured favorable rulings at the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) in its long-running dispute over the Sasan 6×660MW coal-fired power project in India. The dispute centered on outstanding payments under a US$1.311 billion contract, for which Reliance Infrastructure originally provided a payment guarantee. Shanghai Electric previously obtained a US$146.3 million arbitration award against Reliance, a decision upheld by the Singapore International Commercial Court in early 2024. The recent SIAC ruling dismissed claims from Reliance UK's successor, Oxagon Enterprises, and awarded legal costs to Shanghai Electric.
What Happened
Shanghai Electric supplied key equipment and services for the Sasan Power Project in India under a significant contract with Reliance Infrastructure and its then UK subsidiary.
After years without full payment, Shanghai Electric initiated arbitration and obtained an award in 2022 ordering Reliance to pay approximately US$146.3 million, which was later upheld by the Singapore International Commercial Court.
In parallel, Reliance UK (now Oxagon Enterprises) filed arbitration claims seeking hundreds of millions in alleged losses related to the project.
The latest SIAC ruling dismissed Oxagon's claims with prejudice, preventing similar future claims, and ordered Oxagon to pay Shanghai Electric roughly US$1.28 million in legal and expert costs. Shanghai Electric is required to pay a smaller amount of arbitration costs.
The enforceability and timeline for cash recovery remain uncertain, contingent on award enforcement and subsequent accounting treatment.
Context
Shanghai Electric is a China-based conglomerate, active globally in manufacturing and engineering for large energy projects. Its entry into the Sasan Power Project, an ultra-large coal-fired plant in India, exposed the company to significant legal and financial risks common to major cross-border contracts.
The arbitration disputes highlight the complexity of international power infrastructure deals and the potential for protracted legal proceedings over payment guarantees and contract performance.
Why It Matters
- The SIAC rulings reinforce the legal position of Shanghai Electric in seeking payments for international projects.
- Dismissal of Oxagon's claims provides clarity on future liabilities and reduces uncertainty around the Sasan Power Project dispute.
- The case underscores challenges companies face in enforcing awards and recovering funds in large, cross-border infrastructure contracts.
Sources
-
Shanghai Electric Wins Key Rulings in Sasan Power Project Arbitration Battle
theglobeandmail.com