Supreme Court Clarifies Section 26 in National Highway Land Arbitration Award
Stories are grouped across languages, rewritten into a fixed editorial format, and linked to original sources. How we report.
TL;DR
- Supreme Court ruled on compensation for National Highway land acquisition.
- Court found Arbitrator's use of a single residential sale deed invalid.
- Ready Reckoner rate applied as the statutory basis for compensation.
- Non-compliance with Section 26 deemed 'patent illegality' under Section 34.
Overview
On 26 May 2026, the Supreme Court of India in Project Director, NHAI v. Alfa Remidis Ltd. addressed the methodology for calculating compensation in land acquisition matters under the National Highways Act, 1956, holding that arbitrators and courts must follow the structured requirements of Section 26 of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, specifically regarding the use of sale deeds and the Ready Reckoner rate.
What Happened
A 1,394 sq. m. property in Maharashtra was acquired for NH 547-E construction. The Competent Authority classified it as agricultural, awarding Rs. 161.63 per sq. m. based on local agricultural sales.
The claimant argued the land was industrial, with a higher Ready Reckoner valuation and referenced a residential sale deed from a nearby location indicating Rs. 3,588 per sq. m.
The Arbitrator accepted the industrial classification and based the award entirely on the single residential sale deed.
A District Judge (Section 34 court) set aside the award for violating Section 26, but the High Court overruled and reinstated the Arbitrator's award. The Supreme Court ultimately found the Arbitrator's reliance on a single, non-comparable sale deed illegal, restored the Ready Reckoner rate (Rs. 2,020 per sq. m.), and called the award a 'patent illegality.'
Context
The case applies to land compensation arising from National Highway projects, where arbitrators, District Judges, and appellate courts regularly encounter valuation disputes.
The ruling clarifies that statutory provisions of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, specifically Sections 26-28, are mandatory for NH acquisitions, and the 'Removal of Difficulties' Order extends these requirements to the National Highways Act.
Why It Matters
- The decision clarifies the use of statutory compensation mechanisms, emphasizing that sale deeds must closely match the acquired land's use, and that averaging multiple comparable transactions is essential under Section 26.
- The Court's approach underlines that failure to comply with the mandatory statutory framework constitutes patent illegality, allowing courts to set aside non-compliant awards under Section 34.
- The guidance affects future land compensation disputes arising from major infrastructure projects across India.